Home / Competition Review
Competition Review

Equine Canada has established an LTAD Working Group to review and evaluate the current system of equestrian competitions in Canada in order to identify gaps or inconsistencies that might exist between it and our Long-Term Equestrian Development model.  This review gets underway this spring (May 2012) with Endurance and Dressage.

UPDATED | Updates on the review can be read here and here.

2014 LTED update E-1 2014 LTED update2 E-1
February/March 2014 Update April/May 2014 Update

“We will be reviewing our current structure and competition programs in relation to the logical development path of each of our riders, drivers and vaulters from the time they first begin to ride, drive or vault and throughout their equestrian experience,” reports Anne Welch, Chair of the Working Group.

“The competition review will be a collaborative and interactive process during which we will be communicating extensively with our stakeholders, including coaches,organizers, officials, athletes and experts.”

Additionally, the Working Group will, through a study of best practices emerging nationally and internationally, create a template of an “ideal” competition system for discussion that will help us extend our athlete development system to all equestrians in Canada. It will also be making recommendations for realignments to the system if warranted.

“Most importantly, our working group will be looking at the optimal method(s) of developing equestrian athletes, so our riders, drivers and vaulters will be our prime focus,” adds Ms Welch.

Equestrian has achieved some of its best international results over the past few years providing an excellent framework within which to start this review. To provide some additional context, other national sport organizations have been examining their competition calendars and structures and here are some of the challenges that have been identified:

1. Often the adult game/competition is simply imposed on our younger or more inexperienced athletes. This means that some of the fundamental skills, critical for advancing, are not well developed or tested in the right environment.

2. The timing of the competitions may not be appropriate. Is the most important competition of the year at the end of the season?
 
3. Competition access is expensive and may not be necessary depending on the athlete’s stage of development.

4. Many events (structure and timing) are based on tradition and not necessarily on the developmental needs of the athlete.

5. Too many competitions are held in one part of the country and not enough in other parts.

6. Athletes attend too many competitions to the detriment of practicing and training skills. Alternatively, some athletes do not participate in enough competitions, resulting in a lack of opportunity to see if what has been practiced in training, can be applied in a competitive situation.

These issues may or may not apply to Equestrian, and perhaps there are others that have not been identified.

Jill Henselwood, 2008 Olympic silver Medalist and national team athlete has this to say about LTAD: “A logical competition system that facilitates the development of the next generation of athletes in Canada makes good sense. It will result in increased participation, improved retention and more interest in our sport. I strongly support and encourage Equine Canada to design and build a competition system that has as its central focus, the development of the participant.”

Istvan Balyi, Long Term Athlete Development (LTAD) Expert:  “It is the system of competition that makes or breaks an athlete.”

The members of the working group were selected from across Canada and represent diverse skills, knowledge, passion and commitment towards our sport and will work collaboratively towards a common vision of a rich and complete Long Term Athlete Development plan for Equestrian.  The members of the Working Group are:  

Chair:   Anne Welch, Ontario (and Chair, EC Competitions Committee)

Members:  
Jill Barker, Nova Scotia
Ali Buchanan, British Columbia 
Dianne Graham, Ontario
Mike Lawrence, Quebec
Richard Mongeau, Quebec
Terre O’Brennan, British Columbia
Gary Yaghdjian, Ontario

Biographies of our Members

The Working Group is being assisted by the technical expertise of Carolyn Trono, a member of the Canadian Sport for Life (CS4L) Leadership Team and LTAD Lead/Director of Coach Education for Rowing Canada. EC staff involved and supporting the Working Group are Craig Andreas, Chief Operating Officer, and Kalie McKenna, Manager, Coaching. The Working Group is also very pleased to have the support and interest of Rebeccah Bornemann of Sport Canada.

For further information, you’re welcome to email the Working Group at: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it